BUSCADOR RECOLECTA

Supporting schemes including the preparation of AG-Co2+/A/G, AG-Co2+/A/E, and AG-Co2+/H; supporting figures including the distribution of agarose-activated microbeads with different functionalities, immobilization and thermal inactivation kinetics, enzyme desorption assays, confocal fluorescence microscopy images of AG-Co2+/A/G, spectra of intrinsic protein fluorescence, residual activity of HBs under operation conditions and consumed 1,5-pentanediol after 24 h by the soluble or coimmobilized enzymes; supporting tables including the activation degree of agarose microbeads, heterofunctional activation of agarose microbeads, abbreviation of the differently prepared supports, single-enzyme immobilization parameters on AG-Co2+/E microbeads, and thermal stability of soluble enzymes and individual residual activity of coimmobilized enzymes after five batch cycles., Peer reviewed

This data set contains Magnetic Transmission X-ray Microscopy images from a permalloy microstructure acquired at MISTRAL beamline (ALBA Synchrotron) that have been used to obtain the magnetic tomograms analyzed in the research paper "Bloch points and topological dipoles observed by X-ray vector magnetic tomography in a ferromagnetic microstructure" at Communication Physics (2023)., Peer reviewed

There is only one pdf called supp_material.pdf. It contains three sections: 1.- Derivation of a formula making infinitesimal rotations. 2.- A figure that shows the singlet-triplet energy splitting. 3.- A figure that shows how the exchange constant behaves as a function of the applied electric field and the total electric dipole on the junction., Peer reviewed

S1. Operational strategy flow chart: The operational strategy simplified flow chart of the main filling and refuelling events logic is shown in Figure S.1. Operational strategy simplified flow chart concerning the cascaded filling and refuelling processes of the HRS. Compressor C1 and the battery operational strategy is not shown. S2. One-day long simulation supplementary results: This section complementary results for the same simulation configuration of 8 daily HDFVs and 60 kg/day of demand and case c) of Figure 3 of the manuscript. Figure S.2: Compressors flow and power consumption. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for the first day of January, 2016. Figure S.3: (A) left: direct beam irradiance. (A) right: photovoltaic power generation. (B) left: direct beam irradiance. (C) right: electrolyzer H2 flow rate production. (D) left: power balance of the HRS. (D) right: power balance of the HRS without the battery participation. (D) left: State-of-Charge of the battery. (D) right: power charging/discharging rate applied to the battery. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for the first day of January, 2016. S3. One-year long simulation results: Figure S.4: H2 tanks pressure dynamic results of case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for one year of simulation (2016). Figure S.5: (A) left: direct beam irradiance. (A) right: photovoltaic power generation. (B) left: direct beam irradiance. (C) right: electrolyzer H2 flow rate production. (D) left: power balance of the HRS. (D) right: power balance of the HRS without the battery participation. (D) left: State-of-Charge of the battery. (D) right: power charging/discharging rate applied to the battery. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for one year of simulation (2016). Figure S.6: (A) left: cumulative H2 production emissions in Spain [51]. (A) right: equivalent emissions of the photovoltaic generation in Spain [51]. (B) left: cumulative greenhouse gas emission intensity of H2 production in Spain [51]. (B) right: emission savings according to [51]. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for one year of simulation (2016). Figure S.7: (A): cumulative HRS operation emissions due to power consumption/injection to the utility grid in Spain [51]. (B) left: cumulative greenhouse gas emission intensity of HRS operation in Spain [51]. (B) right: emission savings according to [51] considering all power loads and the photovoltaic and battery inputs of the model. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for one year of simulation (2016).-- The ambient temperature is considered constant at 298 K..-- Under a Creative Commons license BY-NC-ND 4.0., S1 Operational strategy flow chart. S2 One-day long simulation supplementary results. S3 One-year long simulation results.-- S2: Results for the first day of January, 2016, in Zaragoza (Spain).-- S3: Results for one year of simulation (2016).-- MATLAB/SimulinkⓇ has been employed as the simulation platform., This research has been developed within the CSIC Interdisciplinary Thematic Platform (PTI+) Transición Energética Sostenible+ (PTI-TRANSENER+)[TRE2103000] as part of the CSIC program for the Spanish Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan funded by the Recovery and Resilience Facility of the European Union, established by the Regulation (EU) 2020/2094; project MASHED [TED2021-129927B–I00] funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR; and the project MAFALDA [PID2021-126001OB-C31] funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF A way of making Europe., Peer reviewed

Experiment performed in the lab, following details described in the publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10212-7, Grant PID2019-104112RB I00 from Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/50110001103). Grant RYC-2016-19939 funded by Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN/ AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033) and “ESF Investing in your future”. The predoctoral contract FPI-UR 2021 (University of La Rioja) support IVD, Peer reviewed

Illustrations of the model system, the calculated chemical potential of ammonia, phase diagram of ammonia chemical potential, the optical property of the structures, the calculated phase diagram, the free energy of formation, the free energy of reaction., Peer reviewed

Both fuel and air reactors were considered fluidized beds in a turbulent or rapid fluidization regime, according to the terminology developed by Kunii and Levenspiel. For their modeling, the fluid-dynamic model presented by Pallarès and Johnsson was adapted to the specific conditions of CH4 combustion by CLC. The fluid dynamic model can be considered 1.5D. The axial direction was the main dimensional parameter, but the existence of gas and solid diffusion in the radial direction was also considered. Both reactors were divided into two regions in the axial direction, each one with different characteristics regarding the distribution and mixing of the oxygen carrier particles. A dense zone was considered in the lower part, with an approximately constant concentration of solids, and a diluted zone above it with a decay of the solids concentration with the height of the reactor. The mass balance in each reactor was carried out considering the main reactions that take place between the oxygen carriers and the reacting gas. The model included the corresponding reaction kinetics as well as the relevant gas phase reactions. The mass balance was developed for every reacting compound in each phase described in the fluid dynamic model. A detailed description of the model along with the equations that govern the fluid dynamic and the mass balance modules are included in previous works. The model was solved using Fortran® code as a high-level programming language. The used algorithm solved simultaneously the air and fuel reactors until the convergence of the solids conversion was reached. This implied that the following essential requirement had to be met at steady state: the amount of oxygen that reacted in the air reactor was the same as that transferred in the fuel reactor. The calculation was done for a given value of the solids circulation rate and, consequently, the oxygen carrier-to-fuel ratio (Φ parameter). For the design of the CLC unit, it was considered the inlet gas velocity at the inlet of every reactor. The gas velocity at the inlet of the air reactor, Ug,AR, was set at 6 m/s to reduce the cross sectional area of the reactor and to allow a high solids entrainment rate in the fast fluidization regime. Likewise, the fuel reactor operated in the turbulent fluidization regime and it was assumed that the gas velocity at the inlet of the reactor, Ug,FR, was equal to the terminal velocity, Ut, of the oxygen carrier particles. This parameter was different for each oxygen carrier since it depended on the operating temperature of the reactor and the density of the material. Figure S1 graphically illustrates the fluidization regime of the fuel reactor and the air reactor in the flow regime map.-- Under a Creative Commons license BY-NC-ND 4.0, S.1. Brief description of the CLC model: Figure S1. Fluidization regime for the fuel reactor and air reactor in the flow regime map., This work was supported by the SWINELOOP (PID2019-106441RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) and CSIC 202180I016 projects. A. Cabello is also grateful for Grant IJC2019-038908-I funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033., Peer reviewed

Here, we provide an improved version of the PN40024 genome assembly, called PN40024.v4, which combines the top-quality Sanger contigs from the 12X version with Pacific Biosciences long reads (Sequel SMRT). Along with this new assembly, we also provide a new version of the gene annotation, called PN40024.v4.1 based on a newly developed annotation workflow, RNA-Seq datasets and manual curation of a set of genes of functional interest to the community. English (2022-10-28), Peer reviewed

Supplemental files are provided with the manuscript. Supplementary File 1 contains additional figures and Supplementary File 2 additional tables. Raw sequencing data and the PN40024.v4 genome assembly are available at ENA under BioProject PRJEB45423. Also, the PN40024.v4 genome assembly with structural and functional gene annotation is available on the INTEGRAPE website (https://integrape.eu/resources/genes-genomes/genome-accessions), on the Grape Genomics Encyclopedia portal (http://grapedia.org/) and under the DOI number doi:10.57745/F9N2FZ (https://entrepot.recherche.data.gouv.fr/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.57745/F9N2FZ). A Sequence Server v2.0.0 interface (http://138.102.159.70:4567/) was set up to perform BLAST analyses. A JBrowse interface (http://138.102.159.70/jbrowse/) was set up to visualize PN40024.v4 assembly and PN40024.v4.1 and v4.2 annotations, but also some previous annotation versions that were transferred, some RNA-Seq alignments and miscellaneous tracks. An Apollo interface (http://138.102.159.70:8080/apollo; training and account mandatory) was set up to manually curate gene annotations according to the dedicated guidelines (https://integrape.eu/resources/data-management/). Code used to analyze GBS data can be found at https://forgemia.inra.fr/sophie.blanc/gbs and code used to generate the PN40024.v4.2 version can be found at https://gitlab.com/MSVteam/pn40024-visualization-tools/-/tree/master/update_gff3_script. Supplemental material available at G3 online., Peer reviewed

Figure S1: Structure and protein sequence analysis of APX family in Ricinus communis (Rc), Manihot esculenta (Me), Jatropha curcas (Jc), Hevea brasiliensis (Hb), Arabidopsis thaliana (At) and Oryza sativa (Os); Figure S2: Sequence logos for the conserved motifs of APX family from Ricinus communis, Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa; Figure S3: Structure and protein sequence analysis of MDAR family in Ricinus communis (Rc), Manihot esculenta (Me), Jatropha curcas (Jc), Hevea brasiliensis (Hb), Arabidopsis thaliana (At) and Oryza sativa (Os); Figure S4: Sequence logos for the conserved motifs of MDAR from Ricinus communis, Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa; Figure S5: Structure and protein sequence analysis of DHAR family in Ricinus communis (Rc), Manihot esculenta (Me), Jatropha curcas (Jc), Hevea brasiliensis (Hb), Arabidopsis thaliana (At) and Oryza sativa (Os); Figure S6: Sequence logos for the conserved motifs of DHAR from Ricinus communis, Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa; Figure S7: Structure and protein sequence analysis of GR family in Ricinus communis (Rc), Manihot esculenta (Me), Jatropha curcas (Jc), Hevea brasiliensis (Hb), Arabidopsis thaliana (At) and Oryza sativa (Os); Figure S8: Sequence logos for the conserved motifs of GR from Ricinus communis, Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa; Figure S9: Cis-regulatory elements in the APX, MDAR, DHAR, and GR promoter regions from Ricinus communis, Manihot esculenta, Jatropha curcas, and Hevea brasiliensis; Figure S10: miRNA targeting RcAPX, RcMDAR, RcDHAR, and RcGR genes; Table S1: APX, MDAR, DHAR and GR sequences from rice and arabidopsis used as bait to BLASTp analysis; Table S2: Sequences of primers used in RT-qPCR experiments; Table S3: Physicochemical parameters and subcellular predictions from APX in Ricinus communis, Manihot esculenta, Jatropha curcas, Hevea brasiliensis; Table S4: Physicochemical parameters and subcellular predictions from MDAR in Ricinus communis, Manihot esculenta, Jatropha curcas, Hevea brasiliensis; Table S5: Physicochemical parameters and subcellular predictions from DHAR in Ricinus communis, Manihot esculenta, Jatropha curcas, Hevea brasiliensis; Table S6: Physicochemical parameters and subcellular predictions from GR in Ricinus communis, Manihot esculenta, Jatropha curcas, Hevea brasiliensis; Table S7: Conserved miRNAs targeting AsA-GSH genes in castor bean., Peer reviewed