BUSCADOR RECOLECTA

Peer reviewed

Table S1: Nutritional composition of the red berries mixture, Table S2: Nutritional composition of cacao powder, Table S3: Demographics and characteristics of the participants at enrollment in each group, Table S4: Blood pressure and heart rate values in each group and by visit, Table S5: p-value from the comparison between diets at the baseline., Peer reviewed

Supplementary Table 1. Correlation coefficients between phenolic compounds and methylxanthines, and the radical scavenging, cytoprotective properties, and cellular antioxidant activity in the coffee pulp flour (CPF) and extract (CPE)., Peer reviewed

Supplementary material: Table S1. Alpha-diversity is expressed as Observed Species, Shannon, and Simpson indexes. Letters denote statistically significant differences between samples and times. Differences regarding the control that are statistically significant (p < 0.05) are marked in gray. Table S2. Genus level. Mean relative abundances (%) and standard deviation. Only genus with a mean relative abundance >0.5% and/or statistically significant were considered. Statistical differences (p-adjust < 0.05) regarding the control and PLAg/PLAm for each volunteer are highlighted, in gray if they appear only for one volunteer or in orange if they are common to at least two volunteers. Table S3. Concentration (µM) of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) at different colonic fermentation times. Table S4. Lactate concentration (µg/mL) at different colonic fermentation times. Table S5. Predicted bacterial pathways present in PLAm and PLAg samples from colonic fermentation simulations for the three volunteers. Only statistically different features comparing to control (q-value<0.05) and with a mean relative abundance >0.01% are shown. met. = metabolism. deg. = degradation. Table S6. Predicted bacterial genes (i.e., enzymes and proteins) present in PLAm and PLAg samples from colonic fermentation simulations for the three volunteers. Only statistically different features comparing to control (q-value<0.05). and with a mean relative abundance >0.01% are shown. Figure S1. Beta-diversity plots of the three volunteers (0, 24, 48, and 72 h) and the different conditions tested (control, PLAg, and PLAm)., Peer reviewed

This PDF file includes: Figs. S1 to S10 Legends for tables S1 to S6, Other Supplementary Material includes the following: Tables S1 to S6, Peer reviewed

Additional STM topographs and spectroscopy data and further results from DFT calculations., Peer reviewed

Expression for the circularly polarized fundamental field convenient for an analysis of nonlinear effects; definition of the charge multipoles in cylindrical coordinates and induced potential of the nanowire; analysis of the induced nonlinear near field; definition of the linear multipolar polarizabilities; discussion on the time-to-frequency Fourier transform used to analyze the time-dependent results of the TDDFT and to obtain the frequency-resolved quantities; classical nonretarded calculations of the linear response; extended discussion of the symmetry constraints for the bulk contribution to nonlinear polarization; derivation of the selection rules based on the nonlinear density response formalism; results showing magnetization of the nanowire by a circularly polarized fundamental field pulse; and discussion of the Friedel oscillations of the ground-state electron density (PDF). Time evolution of the charge density induced in the nanowire, δϱ(n)(r, t) = Re{δϱ(r, nΩ)e–inΩt }, at the fundamental frequency (n = 1) for circular polarization with SAM = 1 of the incoming field (MP4). Time evolution of the charge density induced in the nanowire, δϱ(n)(r, t) = Re{δϱ(r, nΩ)e–inΩt }, at the n = 2 harmonic for circular polarization with SAM = 1 of the incoming field (MP4). Time evolution of the charge density induced in the nanowire, δϱ(n)(r, t) = Re{δϱ(r, nΩ)e–inΩt }, at the n = 3 harmonic for circular polarization with SAM = 1 of the incoming field (MP4). Time evolution of the charge density induced in the nanowire, δϱ(n)(r, t) = Re{δϱ(r, nΩ)e–inΩt }, at n = 4 harmonic for circular polarization with SAM = 1 of the incoming field (MP4). Time evolution of the charge density induced in the nanowire, δϱ(n)(r, t) = Re{δϱ(r, nΩ)e–inΩt }, at the fundamental frequency (n = 1) for linear polarization of the incoming field (MP4). Time evolution of the charge density induced in the nanowire, δϱ(n)(r, t) = Re{δϱ(r, nΩ)e–inΩt }, at the n = 2 harmonic for linear polarization of the incoming field (MP4). Time evolution of the charge density induced in the nanowire, δϱ(n)(r, t) = Re{δϱ(r, nΩ)e–inΩt }, at the n = 3 harmonic for linear polarization of the incoming field (MP4). Time evolution of the charge density induced in the nanowire, δϱ(n)(r, t) = Re{δϱ(r, nΩ)e–inΩt }, at the n = 4 harmonic for linear polarization of the incoming field (MP4)., Peer reviewed

Peer reviewed

Peer reviewed

Peer reviewed