BUSCADOR RECOLECTA

DomoicAcid_Raw_Occurrence_Data.CSV contains the raw occurrence dataset on Domoic Acid contaminant in scallops as extracted from EFSA DWH on the 9 June 2020, 16,369 samples presented in the opinion as described in its section 1.3.2. Occurrence data submitted to EFSA. The data is provided in .csv format. This dataset is compliant with EFSA SSD model and contains two additional columns documenting issues identified in the cleaning process (column: issue) and the action taken (column: outcome) to address the issue (e.g. delete record or update values in specific fields)., Table A1 Description of FoodEx2 codes used to describe scallop species and their anatomical parts Table A2 Data cleaning steps applied to occurrence data on domoic acid in scallops Table A3 Percentage of Left-Censored data and descriptive statistics for Limits of detection (LODs) and Limits of quantification (LOQs) for domoic acid in scallops (mg/kg) Table A4 Descriptive statistics for domoic acid in scallops (mg/kg) as reported in the cleaned database (statistics weighted by number of units per sample) Table A5 Descriptive statistics of body tissue weights (g) of scallops as submitted by data providers, Peer reviewed

Annex A – Protocol for the risk assessments for human health related to the presence of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in food The Annex is provided as a separate pdf file containing the risk assessment protocol selected by the CONTAM Panel to update the previous risk assessments of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in food. Annex B: Occurrence data on HBCDDs in food submitted to EFSA and dietary surveys per country and age group available in the EFSA Comprehensive Database, considered in the exposure assessment Table B.1 Number of analytical results excluded from the initial dataset during data cleaning, and justification for exclusion Table B.2 Occurrence values of HBCDDs calculated total (µg/kg) by food category in the final dataset Table B.3 Food categories of FoodEx and mean LB and UB values as used for the exposure assessment Table B.4 Dietary surveys and the number of subjects by country and population class, available for the chronic exposure assessment, in the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database Table B.5 Summary statistics on data reported for HBCDDs total, analysed with GC-MS, not considered for the exposure Figure B.1 Frequency distribution of the occurrence values for the food categories of interest at the LB without zeros presented on a log 10 scale Figure B.2 Frequency distribution of the occurrence values for the food categories of interest at the UB presented on a log 10 scale HBCDDs_Raw_Occurrence_Data.CSV contains the raw occurrence dataset on Hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDDs) contaminant as extracted from EFSA DWH in December 2019 on 2530 food samples presented in the opinion as described in its section 3.2.1. Occurrence data submitted to EFSA. The data is provided in .csv format. This dataset is compliant with EFSA SSD model and contains two additional columns documenting issues identified in the cleaning process (column: issue) and the action taken (column: outcome) to address the issue (e.g. delete record or update values in specific fields). The link to the catalogues of controlled terminologies can be found under "Related identifiers”. Annex D: Chronic dietary exposure to HBCDDs and the contribution of different food groups to the dietary exposure Table D.1 Mean chronic dietary exposure (ng/kg b.w. per day) to HBCDDs for total population across European dietary surveys Table D.2 95th percentile chronic exposures to HBCDDs (ng/kg b.w. per day) for total population for each dietary survey across age classes Table D.3 Relative contribution (%) of food categories to the LB and UB estimates of dietary exposure to HBCDDs across different age classes, dietary surveys and countries Table D.4 Relative contribution of food categories to the LB estimates of dietary exposure to HBCDDs and related figure Table D.5 Relative contribution of food categories to the UB estimates of dietary exposure to HBCDDs and related figure Annex E – Outcome of the Public consultation on the Update of the risk assessment of hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDDs) in food The Annex is provided as a separate pdf file contain the outcome of the public consultation of the draft scientific Opinion, including the comments received and how they were taken into account when finalising the scientific Opinion, Peer reviewed

Annexes to the Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food - available at: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/6223 Annex A - Occurrence and exposure data Annex B - Distribution of analytical results Annex C - Comparison of PFOA and PFOS occurrence and exposure data with previous assessment (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2018). Also the raw (no data cleaning applied to it) occurrence dataset as extracted from EFSA DWH is provided in csv format. This dataset is compliant with EFSA SSD model and contains two additional columns documenting issues identified in the cleaning process (column: issue) and the action taken (column: action) to address the issue (e.g. delete record or update values in specific fields)., Peer reviewed

This package contains the datasets and supplementary materials used in the IPIN 2020 Competition. Contents: IPIN2020_Track03_TechnicalAnnex_V1-01.pdf: Technical annex describing the competition 01-Logfiles: This folder contains a subfolder with the 78 training logfiles, 72 of them single floor, 4 in bookshelves areas and 2 of them in floor-transition zones, a subfolder with the 13 validation logfiles, and a subfolder with the 1 blind evaluation logfile as provided to competitors. 02-Supplementary_Materials: This folder contains the matlab/octave parser, the raster maps, the files for the matlab tools and the trajectory visualization. 03-Evaluation: This folder contains the scripts used to calculate the competition metric, the 75th percentile on the 82 evaluation points. It requires the Matlab Mapping Toolbox. The ground truth is also provided as a CSV file. Since the results must be provided with a 2Hz freq. starting from apptimestamp 0, the GT includes the closest timestamp matching the timing provided by competitors. It contains a sample of reported estimations and the corresponding results. Additionally, we provide a second script to provide a more detailed report on the results file (requires export_fig folder to run)., Parts of this work were carried out with the financial support received from projects and grants: - A-WEAR (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018, Grant Agreement 813278) - INSIGNIA (PTQ2018-009981) - REPNIN+ network (TEC2017-90808-REDT) - LORIS (TIN2012-38080-C04-04) - SmartLoc(CSIC-PIE Ref.201450E011) - TARSIUS (TIN2015-71564-C4-2-R, MINECO/FEDER) - MICROCEBUS (MICINN, ref. RTI2018-095168-B-C55, MCIU/AEI/FEDER UE) ., Peer reviewed

2015 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), Auckland, 13-17 April 2015, The .xls spreadsheet contains scheduling success ratios and computational cost of the mechanism related to the publication "Seeking Time-Composable Partitions of Tasks for COTS Multicore Processors"., European Commission: SAFURE - SAFety and secURity by design for interconnected mixed-critical cyber-physical systems (644080), Peer reviewed

DAC '15 Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference, ACM New York, New York., The .xls spreadsheet includes the measurements of multicore slowdown as described in the paper "Resource usage templates and signatures for COTS multicore processors"., European Commission: SAFURE - SAFety and secURity by design for interconnected mixed-critical cyber-physical systems (644080), Peer reviewed

Design Automation Conference (DAC), San Francisco, 7-11 June 2015, European Commission: SAFURE - SAFety and secURity by design for interconnected mixed-critical cyber-physical systems (644080), 2015DAC-BSC.02.xlsx, Peer reviewed

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asked the Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) to deliver a scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) biological agents. The QPS approach was developed by the EFSA Scientific Committee to provide a harmonised generic pre-evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents intentionally introduced into the food and feed chain, in support of the concerned scientific Panels and Units in the frame of market authorisations. The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, the safety concerns in relation to pathogenicity and virulence, and the safety for the environment of those microbiological agents are assessed. Safety concerns identified for a respective taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as ‘qualifications’ that are assessed at the strain level by the EFSA’s scientific Panels. Useful links on EFSA QPS EFSA topic on QPS: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/qualified-presumption-safety-qps Link to the virtual issue on QPS on Wiley Online Library: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/toc/10.1002/(ISSN)1831-4732.QPS Versions history: Versions 1 and 2 were substituted by version 3 – all are associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 7: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2017: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5131 Version 4 is associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 8: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2018: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5315 Versions 5 and 6 were substituted by version 7 – all are associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 9: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2018: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5555 Version 8 is associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 10: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2019: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5753 Version 9 is associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 11: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2019: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5965 and with the Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017-2019): https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966 Version 10: updates version 9 following the update of the qualification of Bacillus velezensis as: ‘absence of toxigenic potential and absence of aminoglycoside production ability’ - applied in the QPS Statement part 11 (ON-5965) and in the 2019 Scientific Opinion (ON-5966). Version 11: updates version 10 following the addition of the Bacillus circulans ‘for production purposes only’ - applied in the QPS Statement part 13 (ON-6377) and in the 2019 Scientific Opinion (ON-5966). Version 12 updates version 11 following the addition of the Bacillus paralicheniformis with the qualifications 'absence of toxigenic activity’ and ‘absence of genetic information to synthesize bacitracin'; and adding Schizochytrium limacinum, which is a synomym for Aurantiochytrium limacinum, - applied in the QPS Statement part 14 (ON-6689) and in the 2019 Scientific Opinion (ON-5966). Version 13 updates version 12 following the addition of Haematococcus lacustris synonym Haematococcus pluvialis, recommended for QPS status with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’. Some other changes related to taxonomy and qualifications are described in the QPS Statement part 15 (ON-7045). Version 14, update of version 13, is related to QPS Statement part 16 (ON-7408). Note: As of January 2022 the updated list is provided only as excel file format., The “list of microorganisms with QPS status” first established in 2007, has been revised and updated annually until 2014 via QPS Opinions; since 2014 the updates are carried out and published every 3 years. If new information is retrieved from extended literature searches (ELS) that would change the QPS status of a TU or its qualifications, this is also published in the Panel Statement covering the previous 6-months period. The ELS protocol can be found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3607190 and the Search strategies are available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3607193. The QPS Panel Statement also includes the evaluation of microbiological agents notified to EFSA within the 6-month period for an assessment for feed additives, food enzymes, food additives and flavourings, and novel foods or plant protection products for a possible QPS status. The new QPS status recommendations are incorporated into the 2019 updated “list of microorganisms with QPS status” is available in this upload. The list of “Microbiological agents as notified to EFSA” from 2007, in the context of technical dossiers to EFSA Units, for intentional use in feed and/or food or as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products (PPPs) for safety assessment can be found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3607184., Peer reviewed

This is the list of “Microbiological agents as notified to EFSA” from 2007, in the context of technical dossiers to EFSA Units, for intentional use in feed and/or food or as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products (PPPs) for safety assessment. This is supplementing the QPS statements part 11, part 12, part 13, part 14, part 15, part 16 and the 2019 Scientific Opinion of the BIOHAZ Panel of EFSA - see related identifiers. EFSA topic on QPS: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/qualified-presumption-safety-qps, Microbial species as notified to EFSA_March2022.xlsx, Peer reviewed

Herein, we demonstrate that rapid thermal annealing allows achieving close-to-one photoluminescence quantum yield while preserving the transparency of rare-earth nanocrystal films, which further enables their integration with nanophotonics. The combination with periodic arrays of aluminum nanodisks that support collective plasmonic resonances leads to enhanced directional emission., This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (NANOPHOM, grant agreement no. 715832). E.C.O. acknowledges the grant FPU19/00346 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ESF Investing in your Future. S. M. and K.T. thanks support from MEXT, Japan (Kakenhi 21H04619, 22H01776) and the Futaba foundation., Peer reviewed