Dataset.
Supporting Information: Revisiting niche divergence hypothesis in sexually dimorphic birds: Is diet overlap correlated with sexual size dimorphism?
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/360371
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
- Bravo, Carolina
- Bautista-Sopelana, Luis M.
- Alonso, Juan Carlos
Table S1. Data used in the analysis and data sources.
Table S2. Sample sizes for SSD and explanatory variables: mating system, sexual display, clutch size, and diet overlap.
Table S3. Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) testing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in body mass in relation to diet overlap (Morisita's index) as explanatory variable.
Table S4. Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) testing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in beak length in relation to diet overlap (Morisita's index) as explanatory variable.
Table S5. Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) testing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in wing length in relation to diet overlap (Morisita's index) as explanatory variable.
Table S6. Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) testing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in tarsus in relation to diet overlap (Morisita's index) as explanatory variable.
Table S7. Candidates PGLS "full models" for SSD in body mass, beak length, wing length and tarsus length.
Table S8. Ranking of all path models using the R packages ‘piecewiseSEM’ and ‘lavaan’.
Table S9. Ranking of all path models tested based on CICc values using the R package ‘phylopath’.
Figure S1. Distribution of SSD, calculated as log 10 (male trait / female trait) in four morphological traits: body mass, beak length, wing length and tarsus length.
Figure S2. Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) according to mating systems: monogamy (MG, greeen) and polygyny (PG, orange). Monogamy corresponded to mating system values of 2 and 3 (i.e., monogamy and <5% polygyny) and polygyny to values of 4 and 5 (i.e., <15 polygyny and lek)., Peer reviewed
DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/360371
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/360371
HANDLE: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/360371
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/360371
Ver en: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/360371
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/360371
No hay resultados en la búsqueda
No hay resultados en la búsqueda
×
1 Versiones
1 Versiones
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/360371
Dataset. 2024
SUPPORTING INFORMATION: REVISITING NICHE DIVERGENCE HYPOTHESIS IN SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC BIRDS: IS DIET OVERLAP CORRELATED WITH SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM?
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
- Bravo, Carolina
- Bautista-Sopelana, Luis M.
- Alonso, Juan Carlos
Table S1. Data used in the analysis and data sources.
Table S2. Sample sizes for SSD and explanatory variables: mating system, sexual display, clutch size, and diet overlap.
Table S3. Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) testing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in body mass in relation to diet overlap (Morisita's index) as explanatory variable.
Table S4. Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) testing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in beak length in relation to diet overlap (Morisita's index) as explanatory variable.
Table S5. Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) testing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in wing length in relation to diet overlap (Morisita's index) as explanatory variable.
Table S6. Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) testing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in tarsus in relation to diet overlap (Morisita's index) as explanatory variable.
Table S7. Candidates PGLS "full models" for SSD in body mass, beak length, wing length and tarsus length.
Table S8. Ranking of all path models using the R packages ‘piecewiseSEM’ and ‘lavaan’.
Table S9. Ranking of all path models tested based on CICc values using the R package ‘phylopath’.
Figure S1. Distribution of SSD, calculated as log 10 (male trait / female trait) in four morphological traits: body mass, beak length, wing length and tarsus length.
Figure S2. Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) according to mating systems: monogamy (MG, greeen) and polygyny (PG, orange). Monogamy corresponded to mating system values of 2 and 3 (i.e., monogamy and <5% polygyny) and polygyny to values of 4 and 5 (i.e., <15 polygyny and lek)., Peer reviewed
There are no results for this search
1106