Dataset.

Supporting information for A feedback mechanism controls rDNA copy number evolution in yeast independently of natural selection

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/330943
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Arnau, Vicente
  • Barba-Aliaga, Marina
  • Singh, Gaurav
  • Ferri, Javier
  • García-Martínez, José
  • Pérez-Ortín, José Enrique
S1 Fig. Cellular automaton model accurately predicts the experimentally observed evolution of early cln3. A) Scheme of the algorithm used in Model A (Fig 2A). B) Number of generations and times required to obtain <98% of cells with 220 rDNA repeats and an average generation increase (Delta) between 0.3 and 2 copies. A Delta between 1.2 and 1.4 fits the experimental results (between 160 and 180 generations). S2 Fig. Cellular automaton model by assuming that SIR2 repression linearly decreases. In this case, the cells with 125 copies divide 100% into a daughter with an amplified copy number by a given Delta factor and another cell with no amplification (125 copies). However, the cells with >125 copies have a linear increasing tendency (from 1% to 126 copies to 100% with 220 copies) to divide into two cells with no amplification. The table and the plot show the number of generations required for every possible integral Delta value. Note that only Delta >11 fits the number of experimentally observed generations. S3 Fig. Cellular automaton model by assuming that growth rate differences between cells have different rDNA copy numbers for models B. Scheme of the algorithm used for Models B (Fig 2D and 2E). The figure shows that the growth rate increases (generation time decrease, GTI -9 s). A model for a lowering growth rate would be similar, but with a GTI of +9 s. S1 Table. List of the yeast strains used in this work. S1 Appendix. Algorithm used in Model A1. This appendix describes the pseudocode of Model A1. Both the implementation details and source codes for all the models can be downloaded from https://www.uv.es/varnau/modelo/MODEL_A.c., Peer reviewed
 
DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/330943
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/330943

HANDLE: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/330943
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/330943
 
Ver en: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/330943
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/330943

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/330943
Dataset. 2022

SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR A FEEDBACK MECHANISM CONTROLS RDNA COPY NUMBER EVOLUTION IN YEAST INDEPENDENTLY OF NATURAL SELECTION

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Arnau, Vicente
  • Barba-Aliaga, Marina
  • Singh, Gaurav
  • Ferri, Javier
  • García-Martínez, José
  • Pérez-Ortín, José Enrique
S1 Fig. Cellular automaton model accurately predicts the experimentally observed evolution of early cln3. A) Scheme of the algorithm used in Model A (Fig 2A). B) Number of generations and times required to obtain <98% of cells with 220 rDNA repeats and an average generation increase (Delta) between 0.3 and 2 copies. A Delta between 1.2 and 1.4 fits the experimental results (between 160 and 180 generations). S2 Fig. Cellular automaton model by assuming that SIR2 repression linearly decreases. In this case, the cells with 125 copies divide 100% into a daughter with an amplified copy number by a given Delta factor and another cell with no amplification (125 copies). However, the cells with >125 copies have a linear increasing tendency (from 1% to 126 copies to 100% with 220 copies) to divide into two cells with no amplification. The table and the plot show the number of generations required for every possible integral Delta value. Note that only Delta >11 fits the number of experimentally observed generations. S3 Fig. Cellular automaton model by assuming that growth rate differences between cells have different rDNA copy numbers for models B. Scheme of the algorithm used for Models B (Fig 2D and 2E). The figure shows that the growth rate increases (generation time decrease, GTI -9 s). A model for a lowering growth rate would be similar, but with a GTI of +9 s. S1 Table. List of the yeast strains used in this work. S1 Appendix. Algorithm used in Model A1. This appendix describes the pseudocode of Model A1. Both the implementation details and source codes for all the models can be downloaded from https://www.uv.es/varnau/modelo/MODEL_A.c., Peer reviewed




1106