Dataset.

Thermal acclimation and adaptation in marine protozooplankton and mixoplankton [Dataset]

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/262244
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Calbet, Albert
  • Saiz, Enric
It is a contribution of the Marine Zooplankton Ecology Group (2017 SGR 87), Proper thermal adaptation is key to understanding how species respond to temperature. However, this is seldom considered in protozooplankton and mixoplankton experiments. In this work, we studied how two heterotrophic dinoflagellates (Gyrodinium dominans and Oxyrrhis marina), one heterotrophic ciliate (Strombidium arenicola), and one mixotrophic dinoflagellate (Karlodinium armiger) responded to warming, comparing strains adapted at 16, 19 and 22 °C and those adapted at 16 °C and exposed for 3 days at 19 and 22 °C (acclimated treatments). Neither CNP contents nor the corresponding elemental ratios showed straightforward changes with temperature, except for a modest increase in P contents with temperature in some grazers. In general, the performance of both acclimated and adapted grazers increased from 16 to 19 °C and then dropped at 22 °C, with a few exceptions. Therefore, our organisms followed the “hotter is better” hypothesis from 16 to 19 °C; above 19 °C, however, the results were variable. Despite the disparity in the responses between species and physiological rates, in general, it seems that 19 °C-adapted organisms performed better than acclimated-only organisms. However, at 22 °C, most species were at the limit of their metabolisms and were unable to fully adapt. Nevertheless, adaptation to higher temperatures conferred some advantages prior to sudden increases in temperature (up to 25 °C) that simulated a heatwave episode. In summary, adaptation to temperature seems to confer a selective advantage to protistan grazers within a narrow range (i.e., ca. 3 °C). Adaptation to much higher temperatures (i.e., 6 °C) does not confer any clear physiological advantage (with few exceptions; e.g., the mixotroph K. armiger), at least within the time frame of our experiments, This research was funded by Grant CTM2017-84288-R by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)/ Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades—Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), and by Grant PID2020-118645RB-I00 by Ministerio de Ciencia e innovación (MCIN)/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”. With the institutional support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S), Para 4 especies: Volumen (µm3/depredador), Tasa crecimiento (µ 1/d), Tasa de ingestion (cells/ind/d), Eficiencia bruta de crecimiento (GGE, %), Peer reviewed
 

DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/262244
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/262244

HANDLE: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/262244
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/262244
 
Ver en: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/262244
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/262244

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/205744
. 2020

THERMAL ACCLIMATION AND ADAPTATION IN MARINE MICROZOOPLANKTON

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Calbet, Albert
  • Grigoropoulou, Afroditi
  • Duarte Ferreira, Guilherme
  • Saiz, Enric
Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography Aquatic Sciences Meeting (ASLO 2019), Planet Water - Challenges and Successes, 23 February - 2 March 2019, San Juan, Puerto Rico, The impact of the oceanic temperature raise due to climate change might have profound consequences for key components of marine food webs, such as zooplankton. In general, the fate of a species facing a temperature change in its habitat will depend on the coupling among the different thermal sensitivities of key ecophysiological activities. In this regard, thermal windows define the tolerance range of temperature for a given species, and are a good indicator of its vulnerability to changes in habitat temperature. Here, we report preliminary data on short-term responses (1 day) to temperature changes (range from 5ºC to 34ºC) on microzooplankton. We built thermal windows for two heterotrophic dinoflagellates (Gyrodinium dominans and Oxyrrhis marina) and one ciliate (Strombidium sp.) grown for multiple generations at 19ºC. The variables considered were growth, ingestion rates, and growth gross efficiency. The experiments showed the ciliate to be the more resistant to changes in temperature and the one benefiting the most from a rise in temperature. These contrasted responses between ciliates and dinoflagellates, if confirmed for other species, could have profound implications for the structure of marine communities under future climate change scenarios. In the future, we aim to investigate the thermal sensitivity of key ecophysiological activities of zooplankton to long-term (multigenerational) changes in temperature, and to determine how the coupling of these different thermal sensitivities may result in adaptive advantages or disadvantages for a given species.




Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/264942
Artículo científico (article). 2022

THERMAL ACCLIMATION AND ADAPTATION IN MARINE PROTOZOOPLANKTON AND MIXOPLANKTON

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Calbet, Albert
  • Saiz, Enric
13 pages, 6 figures, 3 tables.-- Data Availability Statement: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article can be found at the open repository (Digital.CSIC, http://hdl.handle.net/10261/262244, https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/14517).-- It is a contribution of the Marine Zooplankton Ecology Group (2017 SGR 87), Proper thermal adaptation is key to understanding how species respond to long-term changes in temperature. However, this is seldom considered in protozooplankton and mixoplankton experiments. In this work, we studied how two heterotrophic dinoflagellates (Gyrodinium dominans and Oxyrrhis marina), one heterotrophic ciliate (Strombidium arenicola), and one mixotrophic dinoflagellate (Karlodinium armiger) responded to warming. To do so, we compared strains adapted at 16, 19, and 22°C and those adapted at 16°C and exposed for 3 days to temperature increases of 3 and 6°C (acclimated treatments). Neither their carbon, nitrogen or phosphorus (CNP) contents nor their corresponding elemental ratios showed straightforward changes with temperature, except for a modest increase in P contents with temperature in some grazers. In general, the performance of both acclimated and adapted grazers increased from 16 to 19°C and then dropped at 22°C, with a few exceptions. Therefore, our organisms followed the “hotter is better” hypothesis for a temperature rise of 3°C; an increase of >6°C, however, resulted in variable outcomes. Despite the disparity in responses among species and physiological rates, 19°C-adapted organisms, in general, performed better than acclimated-only (16°C-adapted organisms incubated at +3°C). However, at 22°C, most species were at the limit of their metabolic equilibrium and were unable to fully adapt. Nevertheless, adaptation to higher temperatures allowed strains to maintain physiological activities when exposed to sudden increases in temperature (up to 25°C). In summary, adaptation to temperature seems to confer a selective advantage to protistan grazers within a narrow range (i.e., ca. 3°C). Adaptation to much higher increases of temperatures (i.e., +6°C) does not confer any clear physiological advantage (with few exceptions; e.g., the mixotroph K. armiger), at least within the time frame of our experiments, This research was funded by Grant CTM2017-84288-R by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)/Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades-Agencia Estatal de Investigacioìn (AEI), and by Grant PID2020-118645RB-I00 by Ministerio de Ciencia e innovación (MCIN)/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF A way of making Europe. [...] With the institutional support of the Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S). The open-access publication fee was partially covered by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI)




Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/262244
Dataset. 2021

THERMAL ACCLIMATION AND ADAPTATION IN MARINE PROTOZOOPLANKTON AND MIXOPLANKTON [DATASET]

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Calbet, Albert
  • Saiz, Enric
It is a contribution of the Marine Zooplankton Ecology Group (2017 SGR 87), Proper thermal adaptation is key to understanding how species respond to temperature. However, this is seldom considered in protozooplankton and mixoplankton experiments. In this work, we studied how two heterotrophic dinoflagellates (Gyrodinium dominans and Oxyrrhis marina), one heterotrophic ciliate (Strombidium arenicola), and one mixotrophic dinoflagellate (Karlodinium armiger) responded to warming, comparing strains adapted at 16, 19 and 22 °C and those adapted at 16 °C and exposed for 3 days at 19 and 22 °C (acclimated treatments). Neither CNP contents nor the corresponding elemental ratios showed straightforward changes with temperature, except for a modest increase in P contents with temperature in some grazers. In general, the performance of both acclimated and adapted grazers increased from 16 to 19 °C and then dropped at 22 °C, with a few exceptions. Therefore, our organisms followed the “hotter is better” hypothesis from 16 to 19 °C; above 19 °C, however, the results were variable. Despite the disparity in the responses between species and physiological rates, in general, it seems that 19 °C-adapted organisms performed better than acclimated-only organisms. However, at 22 °C, most species were at the limit of their metabolisms and were unable to fully adapt. Nevertheless, adaptation to higher temperatures conferred some advantages prior to sudden increases in temperature (up to 25 °C) that simulated a heatwave episode. In summary, adaptation to temperature seems to confer a selective advantage to protistan grazers within a narrow range (i.e., ca. 3 °C). Adaptation to much higher temperatures (i.e., 6 °C) does not confer any clear physiological advantage (with few exceptions; e.g., the mixotroph K. armiger), at least within the time frame of our experiments, This research was funded by Grant CTM2017-84288-R by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)/ Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades—Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), and by Grant PID2020-118645RB-I00 by Ministerio de Ciencia e innovación (MCIN)/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”. With the institutional support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S), Para 4 especies: Volumen (µm3/depredador), Tasa crecimiento (µ 1/d), Tasa de ingestion (cells/ind/d), Eficiencia bruta de crecimiento (GGE, %), Peer reviewed




1106