Dataset.

The strengths and weaknesses of Live Fluorescently Labelled Algae (LFLA) to estimate herbivory in protozooplankton and mixoplankton [Dataset]

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/257594
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Duarte Ferreira, Guilherme
  • Figueira, Joana
  • Marques, Sónia Cotrim
  • Hansen, Per Juel
  • Calbet, Albert
The Live Fluorescently Labelled Algae (LFLA) technique has been used numerous times to estimate micro-zooplankton herbivory. Yet, it is unknown how mixoplankton (i.e., single-cell organisms that can combine phototrophy and phagotrophy) affect the outcome of this technique. Hence, we conducted a broad-spectrum assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the LFLA technique, using several mixoplanktonic and proto-zooplanktonic grazers. Species from different taxonomic groups and different feeding mechanisms were tested in short-term experiments (ca. 5 h) in the laboratory, at different prey concentrations and during light and dark periods of the day. Overall, our findings suggest that the LFLA technique, due to its short-term nature, is an effective tracker of diel ingestion and digestion rates, and can detect new mixoplanktonic predators. We recommend that, irrespective of the prey concentration, incubations to measure grazing rates with this technique should generally be concluded within 1 h (adaptable to the environmental temperature). Nevertheless, our results also call for caution whenever using LFLA in the field: feeding mechanisms other than direct engulfment (like peduncle feeding) may provide severely biased ingestion rates. Furthermore, size and species selectivity are very hard to circumvent. To reduce the effects of selectivity, we propose the combined use of two distinctly coloured fluorochromes (i.e., distinct emission spectra). With this modification, one could either label different size ranges of prey or account for species-specific interactions in the food web, Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 766327. [...] With funding from the Spanish government through the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S)
 

DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/257594
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/257594

HANDLE: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/257594
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/257594
 
Ver en: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/257594
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/257594

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/262551
Artículo científico (article). 2022

THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF LIVE FLUORESCENTLY LABELLED ALGAE (LFLA) TO ESTIMATE HERBIVORY IN PROTOZOOPLANKTON AND MIXOPLANKTON

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Duarte Ferreira, Guilherme
  • Figueira, Joana
  • Cotrim Marques, Sónia
  • Hansen, Per Juel
  • Calbet, Albert
12 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables, supplementary data https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105558.-- Dataset: Duarte Ferreira, Guilherme; Figueira, Joana; Marques, Sónia Cotrim; Hansen, Per Juel; Calbet, Albert; 2022; The strengths and weaknesses of Live Fluorescently Labelled Algae (LFLA) to estimate herbivory in protozooplankton and mixoplankton [Dataset]; DIGITAL.CSIC; https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/14483; http://hdl.handle.net/10261/257594, The Live Fluorescently Labelled Algae (LFLA) technique has been used numerous times to estimate microzooplankton herbivory. Yet, it is unknown how mixoplankton (i.e., single-cell organisms that can combine phototrophy and phagotrophy) affect the outcome of this technique. Hence, we conducted a broad-spectrum assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the LFLA technique, using several mixoplanktonic and protozooplanktonic grazers. Species from different taxonomic groups and different feeding mechanisms were tested in short-term experiments (ca. 5 h) in the laboratory, at different prey concentrations and during light and dark periods of the day. Overall, our findings suggest that the LFLA technique, due to its short-term nature, is an effective tracker of diel ingestion and digestion rates, and can detect new mixoplanktonic predators. We recommend that, irrespective of the prey concentration, incubations to measure grazing rates with this technique should generally be concluded within 1 h (adaptable to the environmental temperature). Nevertheless, our results also call for caution whenever using LFLA in the field: feeding mechanisms other than direct engulfment (like peduncle feeding) may provide severely biased ingestion rates. Furthermore, size and species selectivity are very hard to circumvent. To reduce the effects of selectivity, we propose the combined use of two distinctly coloured fluorochromes (i.e., distinct emission spectra). With this modification, one could either label different size ranges of prey or account for species-specific interactions in the food web, This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 766327. [...] This project is a contribution of the Marine Zooplankton Ecology Group from the Generalitat de Catalunya (2017 SGR 87) with the institutional support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S). Thanks for financial support are also due to MARE (UIDB/04292/2020 + UIDP/04292/2020), to FCT/MEC through national funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020, Peer reviewed

Proyecto: EC/H2020/766327



Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/257594
Dataset. 2022

THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF LIVE FLUORESCENTLY LABELLED ALGAE (LFLA) TO ESTIMATE HERBIVORY IN PROTOZOOPLANKTON AND MIXOPLANKTON [DATASET]

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
  • Duarte Ferreira, Guilherme
  • Figueira, Joana
  • Marques, Sónia Cotrim
  • Hansen, Per Juel
  • Calbet, Albert
The Live Fluorescently Labelled Algae (LFLA) technique has been used numerous times to estimate micro-zooplankton herbivory. Yet, it is unknown how mixoplankton (i.e., single-cell organisms that can combine phototrophy and phagotrophy) affect the outcome of this technique. Hence, we conducted a broad-spectrum assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the LFLA technique, using several mixoplanktonic and proto-zooplanktonic grazers. Species from different taxonomic groups and different feeding mechanisms were tested in short-term experiments (ca. 5 h) in the laboratory, at different prey concentrations and during light and dark periods of the day. Overall, our findings suggest that the LFLA technique, due to its short-term nature, is an effective tracker of diel ingestion and digestion rates, and can detect new mixoplanktonic predators. We recommend that, irrespective of the prey concentration, incubations to measure grazing rates with this technique should generally be concluded within 1 h (adaptable to the environmental temperature). Nevertheless, our results also call for caution whenever using LFLA in the field: feeding mechanisms other than direct engulfment (like peduncle feeding) may provide severely biased ingestion rates. Furthermore, size and species selectivity are very hard to circumvent. To reduce the effects of selectivity, we propose the combined use of two distinctly coloured fluorochromes (i.e., distinct emission spectra). With this modification, one could either label different size ranges of prey or account for species-specific interactions in the food web, Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 766327. [...] With funding from the Spanish government through the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S)

Proyecto: EC/H2020/766327



1106