Dataset.
Marine biomonitoring with eDNA: can metabarcoding of water samples cut it as a tool for surveying benthic communities?
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/283209
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
- Antich, Adrià
- Palacín, Cruz
- Cebrian, Emma
- Wangensteen, Owen S.
- Golo, Raül
- Turon, Xavier
In the marine realm, biomonitoring using eDNA of benthic communities requires destructive direct sampling or the setting-up of settlement structures. Comparatively much less effort is required to sample the water column, which can be accessed remotely. In this study we assess the feasibility of obtaining information from the eukaryotic benthic communities by sampling the adjacent water layer. We studied two different rocky-substrate benthic communities with a technique based on quadrat sampling. We also took replicate water samples at distances from a few centimetres to 20 m from the benthic habitat. Using as marker a fragment of the Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene with universal primers, we obtained a total of 3,543 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) from the samples. The structure obtained in the two environments was markedly different, with Metazoa, Archaeplastida Rhodophyta and Stramenopiles being the most diverse group in benthic samples, and HacrobiaAlveolata, Metazoa and Alveolata Rhizaria in the water. Only 265 MOTUs (7.5%) were shared between benthos and water samples, and of these 180 MOTUs (5.1%) were identified as benthic MOTUs that left their DNA in the water. Most of them were found immediately adjacent to the benthos, and their number decreased and The distribution of these benthic shared MOTUs showed a decrease both in number of MOTUs and in number of reads as we moved apart from the benthic habitat. It was concluded that water eDNA, even in the close vicinity of the benthos, was a poor proxy for the analysis of benthic structure, and that direct sampling methods are required for monitoring these complex benthic communities via metabarcoding., Peer reviewed
DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/283209, http://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.vt4b8gtq2
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/283209
HANDLE: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/283209, http://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.vt4b8gtq2
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/283209
Ver en: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/283209, http://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.vt4b8gtq2
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/283209
No hay resultados en la búsqueda
×
1 Documentos relacionados
1 Documentos relacionados
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/221005
Artículo científico (article). 2020
MARINE BIOMONITORING WITH EDNA: CAN METABARCODING OF WATER SAMPLES CUT IT AS A TOOL FOR SURVEYING BENTHIC COMMUNITIES?
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
- Antich, Adrià
- Palacín, Cruz
- Cebrian, Emma
- Golo, Raül
- Wangensteen, Owen S.
- Turon, Xavier
Este artículo contiene 14 páginas, 5 figuras, 2 tablas.-- Special Issue: Environmental DNA for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Monitoring., In the marine realm, biomonitoring using environmental DNA (eDNA) of benthic communities requires destructive direct sampling or the setting-up of settlement structures. Comparatively much less effort is required to sample the water column, which
can be accessed remotely. In this study we assess the feasibility of obtaining information from the eukaryotic benthic communities by sampling the adjacent water layer.
We studied two different rocky-substrate benthic communities with a technique
based on quadrat sampling. We also took replicate water samples at four distances
(0, 0.5, 1.5, and 20 m) from the benthic habitat. Using broad range primers to amplify
a ca. 313 bp fragment of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene, we obtained a total
of 3,543 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs). The structure obtained
in the two environments was markedly different, with Metazoa, Archaeplastida and
Stramenopiles being the most diverse groups in benthic samples, and Hacrobia,
Metazoa and Alveolata in the water. Only 265 MOTUs (7.5%) were shared between
benthos and water samples and, of these, 180 (5.1%) were identified as benthic taxa
that left their DNA in the water. Most of them were found immediately adjacent to
the benthos, and their number decreased as we moved apart from the benthic habitat. It was concluded that water eDNA, even in the close vicinity of the benthos, was
a poor proxy for the analysis of benthic structure, and that direct sampling methods
are required for monitoring these complex communities via metabarcoding., This research has been funded by project BIGPARK of the Spanish
Autonomous Organism of National Parks (OAPN, project 2017-
2462), and by projects PopCOmics (CTM2017-88080, MINECO/
AEI/FEDER,UE) and ANIMA (CGL2016-76341-R, MINECO/AEI/
FEDER,UE) of the Spanish Government. AA was funded by a predoctoral FPI contract of the Spanish Government. This is a contribution from the Consolidated Research Group “Benthic Biology and
Ecology” SGR2017-1120 (Catalan Government)., Peer reviewed
×
1 Versiones
1 Versiones
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/283209
Dataset. 2020
MARINE BIOMONITORING WITH EDNA: CAN METABARCODING OF WATER SAMPLES CUT IT AS A TOOL FOR SURVEYING BENTHIC COMMUNITIES?
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
- Antich, Adrià
- Palacín, Cruz
- Cebrian, Emma
- Wangensteen, Owen S.
- Golo, Raül
- Turon, Xavier
In the marine realm, biomonitoring using eDNA of benthic communities requires destructive direct sampling or the setting-up of settlement structures. Comparatively much less effort is required to sample the water column, which can be accessed remotely. In this study we assess the feasibility of obtaining information from the eukaryotic benthic communities by sampling the adjacent water layer. We studied two different rocky-substrate benthic communities with a technique based on quadrat sampling. We also took replicate water samples at distances from a few centimetres to 20 m from the benthic habitat. Using as marker a fragment of the Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene with universal primers, we obtained a total of 3,543 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) from the samples. The structure obtained in the two environments was markedly different, with Metazoa, Archaeplastida Rhodophyta and Stramenopiles being the most diverse group in benthic samples, and HacrobiaAlveolata, Metazoa and Alveolata Rhizaria in the water. Only 265 MOTUs (7.5%) were shared between benthos and water samples, and of these 180 MOTUs (5.1%) were identified as benthic MOTUs that left their DNA in the water. Most of them were found immediately adjacent to the benthos, and their number decreased and The distribution of these benthic shared MOTUs showed a decrease both in number of MOTUs and in number of reads as we moved apart from the benthic habitat. It was concluded that water eDNA, even in the close vicinity of the benthos, was a poor proxy for the analysis of benthic structure, and that direct sampling methods are required for monitoring these complex benthic communities via metabarcoding., Peer reviewed
There are no results for this search
1106