BUSCADOR RECOLECTA

Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC

oai:digital.csic.es:10261/331334

Appendix S1: Questionnaire used in this study. Farmer's perceptions of vulture attacks on livestock. Appendix S2: Number of farmers who have responded each question and number of responses obtained. Appendix S3. Livestock type and characteristics (percentages) involved in the 616 complaints reported from 2008–2020: cattle (n = 471), horses (n = 92) and sheep/goats (n = 53). Appendix S4: Number of farms for each livestock type managed by the 133 farmers interviewed, and number of farms reporting attacks and characteristics (%) of the livestock involved. Some farmers provided multiple responses regarding the characteristics of the livestock involved in the attacks. Appendix S5: Models (GLMs) determining the number of complaints for vulture attacks on livestock. We present the variables included in the set of models (model description); the number of estimated parameters (K); the Akaike Information Criteria corrected for small sample sizes (AICc); and the Akaike weight (wi) by the models evaluated (32 models; n = 110). Abbreviations relating to variables correspond to: ‘extensive livestock density’ (Ext); ‘distance to nearest landfill site’ (Dland); ‘number of griffon vulture pairs’ (Gpair); ‘griffon vulture abundance’ (Gabun); and ‘distance to nearest supplementary feeding station’ (DSFS). Selected models are shown in bold. Appendix S6: Relative importance of the variables estimated from the Akaike weight of the 32 models evaluated in the analysis of the determinants of the number of complaints for vulture attacks on livestock. Values close to 1 indicate variables that appear in most models and that show the highest likelihood given the data, i.e., those that show the highest Akaike weight values., Peer reviewed