Resultados de investigación

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of maintaining or withdrawing abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had experienced cancer progression to this treatment and were beginning a docetaxel-based therapy. Phase II, randomised, open-label study conducted in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. After open-label treatment with AAP, patients who had experienced cancer progression to AAP were randomised to 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel plus AAP or to receive 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel plus 10 mg of prednisone orally daily. The primary outcome was the radiographic progression-free survival rate at 12 months as evaluated by the investigators in all randomised patients. A total of 148 patients were included in open-label treatment with AAP, and of them, 94 patients were randomised to receive either docetaxel plus AAP (intervention group; n = 47) or docetaxel plus prednisone (control group; n = 47). The 12-month radiographic progression-free survival rates did not differ between the intervention group (34.9%; 95% CI 20.7-49.2) and the control group (33.9%; 95% CI 19.5-48.3). There were no significant differences in the time to radiographic progression and the overall survival between the intervention and control groups. Grade 3-5 neutropenia with the combination of docetaxel plus prednisone and AA was more frequent than with docetaxel plus prednisone (59.6% versus 27.7%). Our results indicate that the therapeutic strategy of maintaining AAP added to docetaxel in chemotherapy-naïve patients who have experienced cancer progression to AAP treatment should not be further evaluated and should be avoided in clinical practice., Si

Recent years have seen great advances in the use of clinical ultrasound imaging in both hospital emergency departments and out-of-hospital settings. However, all new techniques require up-to-date definitions of competencies relevant to the clinical realities of different specialties and the geographic settings in which specialists work. To that end, a group of experts in clinical ultrasound reviewed the evidence available in the literature and strictly applied the Delphi method to define the competencies relevant to emergency physicians. The group worked with the starting premise that clinical ultrasound imaging should be a common competency across the specialty., En los últimos años se han producido grandes avances en el uso de la ecografía clínica tanto en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios como en el ámbito extrahospitalario. Sin embargo, toda nueva técnica requiere de definiciones actualizadas de competencias relevantes para las realidades clínicas de las diferentes especialidades y los entornos geográficos en los que trabajan los especialistas. Para ello, un grupo de expertos en ecografía clínica revisó la evidencia disponible en la literatura y aplicó estrictamente el método Delphi para definir las competencias relevantes para los médicos de urgencias. El grupo trabajó con la premisa de partida de que la ecografía clínica debería ser una competencia común para toda la especialidad., Yes

Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) are mesenchymal neoplasms, with potential aggressive course and relevant clinical impact. New systemic therapy modalities are needed in this symptomatic/progressive population. In this multicenter, phase II trial (NCT03275818), patients with symptomatic/progressing DF received three cycles of weekly nab-paclitaxel. Brief pain inventory short form (BPI-SF) was collected at baseline and in every visit. MRI was performed every 3 months. Primary composite endpoint was RECIST 1.1 overall response rate (ORR) and/or clinical response (improvement ≥ 2 points in BPI-SF). If 40% of patients achieved clinical/radiological response, further investigation would be warranted. Toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), pattern of response and its correlation with clinical best response and BPI, variation of physical function, and analgesic consumption were secondary endpoints. The translational research reported was not a pre-specified secondary outcome. Forty eligible patients started therapy, being 35 radiologically and clinically evaluable. The study achieved its primary endpoint, as 7(20%) patients obtained RECIST partial response, whereas 31(89%) experienced pain reduction of ≥2 points in BPI-SF worst pain. Therapy was well tolerated. With a median follow-up of 30(14-44) months, median 12 and 24-months PFS rates were 91%(CI 95%, 82-100) and 84%(CI 95%, 71-97). For clinical progression, 12 and 24-months PFS rates were 85% (CI 95%, 73-97) and 74% (CI 95%, 58-90) respectively. Short course of nab-paclitaxel is active, safe and achieves quick and durable responses in progressing/symptomatic DF patients., Moura is recipient of a Sara Borrell postdoctoral fellowship funded by the National Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII) (CD20/00155). The authors would also like to thank SELNET project. SELNET has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 825806., Si

Switching to the 2-drug regimen dolutegravir + rilpivirine demonstrated noninferiority vs continuing a 3-drug or 4-drug current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) at week 48 and maintained high levels of virologic suppression to week 148 in the SWORD studies. We report inflammation and atherogenesis biomarkers postswitch to dolutegravir + rilpivirine. SWORD-1: 65 centers, 13 countries; SWORD-2: 60 centers, 11 countries. Virologically suppressed adults were randomized to switch to dolutegravir + rilpivirine (early-switch group; n = 513) or continue CAR (n = 511). Participants continuing CAR switched to dolutegravir + rilpivirine at week 52 (late-switch group; n = 477). Biomarkers were evaluated from Baseline to week 48 for dolutegravir + rilpivirine and CAR and noncomparatively for dolutegravir + rilpivirine postswitch through 148 weeks (early-switch) and 96 weeks (late-switch). Through week 48, changes in biomarkers did not significantly differ between dolutegravir + rilpivirine and CAR groups, except for increases in soluble CD14 and decreases in fatty acid-binding protein-2, which favored dolutegravir + rilpivirine. For inflammation biomarkers through week 148, there was no marked change in C-reactive protein, inconsistent changes in soluble CD14 and interleukin-6, and increases in soluble CD163. For atherogenesis biomarkers through week 148, fatty acid-binding protein-2 and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 showed sustained reductions; D-dimer showed inconsistent increases between early-switch vs late-switch groups. No consistent pattern of change in biomarkers postswitch to dolutegravir + rilpivirine was observed through weeks 48 and 148 in SWORD-1/SWORD-2, suggesting no association of increased inflammation or atherogenesis with the 2-drug regimen while maintaining virologic suppression., Si

Antipsychotic choice for the acute phase of a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is of the utmost importance since it may influence long-term outcome. However, head-to-head comparisons between second-generation antipsychotics remain scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness in the short term of aripiprazole and risperidone after FEP outbreak. From February 2011 to October 2018, a prospective, randomized, open-label study was undertaken. Two hundred-sixty-six first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n = 136) or risperidone (n = 130) and followed-up for 12 weeks. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted to assess clinical efficacy. The overall dropout rate at 12 weeks was small (6.39%). Effectiveness measures were similar between treatment arms as treatment discontinuation rates (χ 2 = 0,409; P = .522), and mean time to all-cause discontinuation (log rank χ 2 = -1.009; P = .316) showed no statistically significant differences. Despite no statistically significant differences between groups regarding clinical efficacy, aripiprazole required higher chlorpromazine equivalent dosage (χ 2 = 2.160; P = .032) and extended mean time (W = 8183.5; P = .008) to reach clinical response. Sex-related adverse events and rigidity were more frequent in the risperidone group, whereas sialorrhea was on the aripiprazole group. No differences regarding effectiveness were found between aripiprazole and risperidone for the short-phase treatment of FEP. Despite the importance of efficacy during this phase, differences in side effect profiles and patient's preferences are essential factors that may lead clinical decisions for these patients. NCT02532491. Effectiveness of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in First Episode Psychosis Patients: 1-year Follow-up (PAFIP3_1Y)., Si

Surrogate endpoints that predict complications are necessary for assessment and approval of NASH therapies. We assessed associations between histologic and noninvasive tests (NITs) of fibrosis with liver-related complications in patients with NASH cirrhosis. Patients with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH were enrolled in two placebo-controlled trials of simtuzumab and selonsertib. Liver fibrosis at baseline and week 48 (W48) was staged by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) and Ishak classifications and a machine learning (ML) approach, hepatic collagen and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression were quantified by morphometry, liver stiffness (LS) was measured by transient elastography, and serum NITs (enhanced liver fibrosis [ELF], NAFLD fibrosis score [NFS], and Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4]) were calculated. Cox regression determined associations between these parameters at baseline and their changes over time with adjudicated liver-related clinical events. Among 1,135 patients, 709 (62%) had Ishak stage 6 fibrosis, and median ELF and LS were 10.66 and 21.1 kPa, respectively. During a median follow-up of 16.6 months, 71 (6.3%) had a liver-related event; associated baseline factors included Ishak stage 6 fibrosis, and higher hepatic collagen, α-SMA expression, ML-based fibrosis parameters, LS, ELF, NFS, and FIB-4. Cirrhosis regression observed in 16% (176/1,135) between BL and W48 was associated with a lower risk of events versus nonregression (1.1% [2/176] vs. 7.2% [69/957]; HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04, 0.65 [p = 0.0104]). Conversely, after adjustment for baseline values, increases in hepatic collagen, α-SMA, ML-based fibrosis parameters, NFS, and LS were associated with an increased risk of events. In patients with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH, regression of fibrosis is associated with a reduction in liver-related complications. These data support the utility of histologic fibrosis regression and NITs as clinical trial endpoints for NASH cirrhosis., Si

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the safety of two regorafenib dose-escalation approaches in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Patients with mCRC and progression during or within 3 months following their last standard chemotherapy regimen were randomised to receive the approved dose of regorafenib of 160 mg QD (arm A) or 120 mg QD (arm B) administered as 3 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week off, or 160 mg QD 1 week on/1 week off (arm C). The primary end-point was the percentage of patients with G3/G4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in each arm. There were 299 patients randomly assigned to arm A (n = 101), arm B (n = 99), or arm C (n = 99); 297 initiated treatments (arm A n = 100, arm B n = 98, arm C n = 99: population for safety analyses). G3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 60%, 55%, and 54% of patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The most common G3/4 AEs were hypertension (19, 12, and 20 patients), fatigue (20, 14, and 15 patients), hypokalemia (11, 7, and 10 patients), and hand-foot skin reaction (8, 7, and 3 patients). Median overall survival was 7.4 (IQR 4.0-13.7) months in arm A, 8.6 (IQR 3.8-13.4) in arm B, and 7.1 (IQR 4.4-12.4) in arm C. The alternative regorafenib dosing schedules were feasible and safe in patients with mCRC who had been previously treated with standard therapy. There was a higher numerical improvement on the most clinically relevant AEs in the intermittent dosing arm, particularly during the relevant first two cycles., Si

Aripiprazole and risperidone are 2 of the most used second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) worldwide. Previous evidence shows a similar effect of these SGAs on weight and metabolic changes in the short term. However, a longer period is necessary for a better assessment of the SGA´s metabolic profile. We aimed to compare the long-term (1-year) metabolic profile of these 2 antipsychotics on a sample of drug-naïve first episode-psychosis (FEP) patients. A total 188 drug-naïve patients, suffering from a first episode of non-affective psychosis (FEP), were randomly assigned to treatment with either aripiprazole or risperidone. Weight and glycemic/lipid parameters were recorded at baseline and after 1-year follow-up. We observed significant weight increments in both groups (9.2 kg for aripiprazole and 10.5 kg for risperidone) after 1 year of treatment. Despite this, weight and body mass index changes did not significantly differ between treatment groups (P > .05). Similarly, both treatment groups presented similar metabolic clinical impact with a comparable increase in the proportion of participants meeting criteria for metabolic disorders such as obesity or hypercholesterolemia, but not for metabolic syndrome (Δ9.2% vs Δ4.3%) or hypertriglyceridemia (Δ21.9% vs Δ8.0%), where aripiprazole showed worse outcomes than risperidone. This study shows that aripiprazole and risperidone share a similar long-term metabolic profile. After 1 year of antipsychotic treatment, drug-naïve FEP patients in both treatment groups presented a significant increase in weight and metabolic changes, leading to a greater prevalence of metabolic disorders., Si

Resultados interactivos de una investigación llevada a cabo sobre la implementación de estrategias de rehabilitación optimizadas aplicadas al parque residencial social del sur de España en diferentes zonas climáticas (A3, A4, B4 y C3), ante escenarios climáticos futuros de cambio climático. En concreto, se ha realizado un análisis multiobjetivo en el que se optimizan, a partir de la aplicación de algoritmos genéticos, los costes de intervención de diversas soluciones de rehabilitación y el confort térmico interior en verano e invierno de las viviendas sociales, bajo escenarios futuros de calentamiento global. Todo ello se realiza mediante modelos parametrizados y validados a nivel de conjunto edificatorio, implementando información real contenida en una base de datos facilitada por la Agencia de Vivienda y Rehabilitación de Andalucía (AVRA) en los modelos de simulación dinámica de conjunto. Los resultados de esta investigación están vinculados con el proyecto: Optimización Paramétrica de Fachadas de Doble Piel en Clima Mediterráneo para la Mejora de la Eficiencia Energética ante Escenarios de cambio Climático (BIA2017-86383-R)., La visualización de los resultados de esta investigación se realiza a través de ficheros .html que pueden ser accedidos fácilmente mediante cualquier navegador web. Existen tres tipos de figuras interactivas: gráficas de dispersión en 3d, gráficas de dispersión en 2d y gráficas de ejes paralelos. Se ha generado por cada zona climática analizada estos tres tipos de gráficos. En el caso de los gráficos de dispersión en 3d, el entorno web permite girar y aumentar la figura, para facilitar su visualización en el espacio. Además, colocando el cursor sobre cada punto, pueden consultarse los valores específicos de las variables de optimización (porcentaje de horas con temperaturas por encima del límite superior e inferior del confort y costes de inversión en €/m2 construido). En los gráficos en dispersión en 2d, colocando el cursor sobre cada punto, se despliega una ventana en la que pueden visualizarse los diferentes valores asociados a ese punto. En lo referente a las figuras de coordenadas paralelas, las variables de optimización pueden filtrase, seleccionando y arrastrando el cursor sobre un rango de valores buscado. Lo mismo puede realizarse con el resto de variables combinatorias. Hecho esto, la herramienta web mostrará la combinación de los paquetes de rehabilitación óptimos (variables de rehabilitación ligadas a la mejora energética de la envolvente térmica y las variables operacionales analizadas). Cada combinación, tendrá asociado un valor concreto de horas fuera del confort en verano e invierno, así como de costes de inversión. Por consiguiente, es posible realizar una comparación rápida y genérica entre diferentes actuaciones y seleccionar, de forma acorde, valorando los resultados, las medidas de rehabilitación que mejor se ajusten a los Programas e Iniciativas rehabilitadoras consideradas.

Resultados interactivos de una investigación llevada a cabo sobre la implementación de estrategias de rehabilitación optimizadas aplicadas al parque residencial social del sur de España en diferentes zonas climáticas (A3, A4, B4 y C3), ante escenarios climáticos actuales y futuros. En concreto, se ha realizado un análisis multiobjetivo en el que se optimizan, a partir de la aplicación de algoritmos genéticos, los costes de intervención de diversas soluciones de rehabilitación y el confort térmico interior en verano e invierno de las viviendas sociales. Todo ello se realiza mediante modelos parametrizados y validados a nivel de conjunto edificatorio, implementando información real contenida en una base de datos facilitada por la Agencia de Vivienda y Rehabilitación de Andalucía (AVRA) en los modelos de simulación dinámica de conjunto. Los resultados de esta investigación están vinculados con el proyecto: Optimización Paramétrica de Fachadas de Doble Piel en Clima Mediterráneo para la Mejora de la Eficiencia Energética ante Escenarios de cambio Climático (BIA2017-86383-R)., La visualización de los resultados de esta investigación se realiza a través de ficheros .html que pueden ser accedidos fácilmente mediante cualquier navegador web. Existen dos tipos de figuras interactivas: gráficas de dispersión y gráficas de ejes paralelos. Se ha generado por cada zona climática analizada estos dos tipos de gráficos. En el caso de los gráficos de dispersión en 3D, el entorno web permite girar y aumentar la figura, para facilitar su visualización en el espacio. Además, colocando el cursor sobre cada punto, pueden consultarse los valores específicos de las variables de optimización (porcentaje de horas con temperaturas por encima del límite superior e inferior del confort y costes de inversión en €/m2 construido). En lo referente a las figuras de coordenadas paralelas, las variables de optimización pueden filtrase, seleccionando y arrastrando el cursor sobre un rango de valores buscado. Lo mismo puede realizarse con el resto de variables combinatorias. Hecho esto, la herramienta web mostrará la combinación de los paquetes de rehabilitación óptimos (variables de rehabilitación ligadas a la mejora energética de la envolvente térmica y las variables operacionales analizadas). Cada combinación, tendrá asociado un valor concreto de horas fuera del confort en verano e invierno, así como de costes de inversión. Por consiguiente, es posible realizar una comparación rápida y genérica entre diferentes actuaciones y seleccionar, de forma acorde, valorando los resultados, las medidas de rehabilitación que mejor se ajusten a los Programas e Iniciativas rehabilitadoras consideradas.