Resultados de investigación

Files are organized within folders and subfolders, ordered by Figure and Figure Panel, containing progressive steps in data processing, from raw data to final version used in Figure Panels. Original Figures shown in the article were made using Adobe Illustrator from the images described below. Microscopy images: - .lei files are the raw data collected with Leica acquisition software; from which .tif files were generated during progressive steps in data processing with Fiji (Fiji Is Just ImageJ). - Each different date indicates an independent experiment. The data processing performed is described in the corresponding file name. In some cases, we provide microscopy images from additional examples and/or controls to those shown in the article. Quantifications and statistical analysis: - The quantifications performed are annotated in .xlsx, generated with Microsoft Excel; .txt files, generated from the .xlsx files, were used for statistical analysis using RStudio. All the R libraries and the specific functions used are indicated in the scripts, .R files. Graphs were exported as .pdf files from RStudio., Peer reviewed

Muscle development is a multistep process that involves cell specification, myoblast fusion, myotube migration, and attachment to the tendons. In spite of great efforts trying to understand the basis of these events, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying myotube migration. Knowledge of the few molecular cues that guide this migration comes mainly from studies in Drosophila. The migratory process of Drosophila embryonic muscles involves a first phase of migration, where muscle progenitors migrate relative to each other, and a second phase, where myotubes migrate searching for their future attachment sites. During this phase, myotubes form extensive filopodia at their ends oriented preferentially toward their attachment sites. This myotube migration and the subsequent muscle attachment establishment are regulated by cell adhesion receptors, such as the conserved proteoglycan Kon-tiki/Perdido. Laminins have been shown to regulate the migratory behavior of many cell populations, but their role in myotube migration remains largely unexplored. Here, we show that laminins, previously implicated in muscle attachment, are indeed required for muscle migration to tendon cells. Furthermore, we find that laminins genetically interact with kon-tiki/perdido to control both myotube migration and attachment. All together, our results uncover a new role for the interaction between laminins and Kon-tiki/Perdido during Drosophila myogenesis. The identification of new players and molecular interactions underlying myotube migration broadens our understanding of muscle development and disease., Peer reviewed

Muscle development is a multistep process that involves cell specification, myoblast fusion, myotube migration, and attachment to the tendons. In spite of great efforts trying to understand the basis of these events, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying myotube migration. Knowledge of the few molecular cues that guide this migration comes mainly from studies in Drosophila. The migratory process of Drosophila embryonic muscles involves a first phase of migration, where muscle progenitors migrate relative to each other, and a second phase, where myotubes migrate searching for their future attachment sites. During this phase, myotubes form extensive filopodia at their ends oriented preferentially toward their attachment sites. This myotube migration and the subsequent muscle attachment establishment are regulated by cell adhesion receptors, such as the conserved proteoglycan Kon-tiki/Perdido. Laminins have been shown to regulate the migratory behavior of many cell populations, but their role in myotube migration remains largely unexplored. Here, we show that laminins, previously implicated in muscle attachment, are indeed required for muscle migration to tendon cells. Furthermore, we find that laminins genetically interact with kon-tiki/perdido to control both myotube migration and attachment. All together, our results uncover a new role for the interaction between laminins and Kon-tiki/Perdido during Drosophila myogenesis. The identification of new players and molecular interactions underlying myotube migration broadens our understanding of muscle development and disease., Peer reviewed

Muscle development is a multistep process that involves cell specification, myoblast fusion, myotube migration, and attachment to the tendons. In spite of great efforts trying to understand the basis of these events, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying myotube migration. Knowledge of the few molecular cues that guide this migration comes mainly from studies in Drosophila. The migratory process of Drosophila embryonic muscles involves a first phase of migration, where muscle progenitors migrate relative to each other, and a second phase, where myotubes migrate searching for their future attachment sites. During this phase, myotubes form extensive filopodia at their ends oriented preferentially toward their attachment sites. This myotube migration and the subsequent muscle attachment establishment are regulated by cell adhesion receptors, such as the conserved proteoglycan Kon-tiki/Perdido. Laminins have been shown to regulate the migratory behavior of many cell populations, but their role in myotube migration remains largely unexplored. Here, we show that laminins, previously implicated in muscle attachment, are indeed required for muscle migration to tendon cells. Furthermore, we find that laminins genetically interact with kon-tiki/perdido to control both myotube migration and attachment. All together, our results uncover a new role for the interaction between laminins and Kon-tiki/Perdido during Drosophila myogenesis. The identification of new players and molecular interactions underlying myotube migration broadens our understanding of muscle development and disease., Peer reviewed

Muscle development is a multistep process that involves cell specification, myoblast fusion, myotube migration, and attachment to the tendons. In spite of great efforts trying to understand the basis of these events, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying myotube migration. Knowledge of the few molecular cues that guide this migration comes mainly from studies in Drosophila. The migratory process of Drosophila embryonic muscles involves a first phase of migration, where muscle progenitors migrate relative to each other, and a second phase, where myotubes migrate searching for their future attachment sites. During this phase, myotubes form extensive filopodia at their ends oriented preferentially toward their attachment sites. This myotube migration and the subsequent muscle attachment establishment are regulated by cell adhesion receptors, such as the conserved proteoglycan Kon-tiki/Perdido. Laminins have been shown to regulate the migratory behavior of many cell populations, but their role in myotube migration remains largely unexplored. Here, we show that laminins, previously implicated in muscle attachment, are indeed required for muscle migration to tendon cells. Furthermore, we find that laminins genetically interact with kon-tiki/perdido to control both myotube migration and attachment. All together, our results uncover a new role for the interaction between laminins and Kon-tiki/Perdido during Drosophila myogenesis. The identification of new players and molecular interactions underlying myotube migration broadens our understanding of muscle development and disease., Peer reviewed

Autonomous oscillatory dynamics are ubiquitous at every level in Biology. At the cellular level, one of the most relevant and well characterized examples of periodic behavior is the cyclic assembly and disassembly of actomyosin networks. In Drosophila, these oscillations induce the robust contraction and expansion of individual cells required for correct dorsal closure, while in the follicular epithelium that surrounds the germline, periodic contractions of the basal actomyosin network are required for proper elongation of the egg chamber. While some studies suggest that actomyosin oscillations are driven by upstream signaling or mechanochemical features, we have recently proposed that they arise as a systems property from the competition between two well characterized features of the actomyosin machinery: 1) cooperative assembly of actin networks mediated by Actin crosslinker proteins and 2) tension-induced disassembly of actin networks mediated by myosin motors. Here, we perform experiments in amnioserosa and in the follicle cells of drosophila and simulations using a coarse-grained model of the actomyosin cortex to characterize the properties of the oscillations and how they depend on different features of the system. We also compare model and experiments to study the dynamics of actomyosin flows and the effect of mechanical coupling between cells in the tissue. In conclusion, our model is a powerful tool to study key features of actomyosin oscillations, from the effect of the individual components to network properties and finally supra-cellular organization of the oscillations at the tissue level., Peer reviewed

Additional file 1: Movie S1. Time-lapse movie of the system with F-actin forming and treadmilling in the grid., Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Peer reviewed

Additional file 2 Figure S1. Percentage of G-Actin in filaments. Percentage of G-Actin in filaments of different size for the three characteristic regimes., Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Peer reviewed

Additional file 3 Figure S2. Dependence of speed of treadmiling with F-actin length. Plot of the dependence of the instantaneous speed on the filament size. Short filaments move faster than average. Long filaments move at the same speed in average., Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Peer reviewed

Additional file 4: Movie S2. Time-lapse movie of the system with F-actin and ACs. G-actin is labeled in green, ACs labeled in blue., Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Peer reviewed