BUSCADOR RECOLECTA

The dataset shows individual responses to the last round of a Delphi study with health professionals. The study aims to evaluate the content validity of the ICF-CSs for schizophrenia from the perspective of experts in the treatment of this population, as well as to identify the potential repercussions of this health condition in the functioning of people diagnosed with this disorder. The results provide important support for the worldwide content validity of the ICF-CSs for schizophrenia from the expert perspective and highlight the relevance, in the evaluation and treatment of people with schizophrenia, of assessing functioning by considering the body functions, participation in activities, environmental aspects and personal factors that experts have identified.

Raw data from the study Validation of the Spanish Version of the Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS). The study is centered in adapting and validating a Spanish version of the Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS). Results suggested that the Spanish version of the IPS offer valid and reliable scores when applied to adult population.

Raw data from the study Functioning in Schizophrenia from the Perspective of Psychologists: A Worldwide Study. The study aimed to explore the content validity of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for schizophrenia from the perspective of psychologists. The results support the content validity of the ICF Core Sets for schizophrenia from the perspective of psychologists and suggest that they are an appropriate framework for describing functioning and disability in individuals with schizophrenia.

Raw data from the study “School staff members knowledge of victimization, detection and reporting”. The study is centered in analyzing the level of knowledge of school staff members of Barcelona city of victimization, its detection and its reporting. Knowledge in this areas is measured through thirty statements to classify as true or false. The statements are coded as follows: F1 to F10: Statements about victimization F11 to F20: Statements about detection F21 to F30: Statements about reporting Correctly classified statements are coded with “1” and wrongly classified or unknown statements were coded as “0”. The data also includes variables of interest, such as self-perceived efficacy to detect sign in minors (“Scm”), self-perceived efficacy to detect signs in families (“Scf”), if the participant ever had a suspicions that a child under their care might be being victimized (“Detec”) and if the participant ever reported a potential victimization case outside the school (“Repor”). All these variables are coded as “1” if they were answered positively and “0” if they were answered negatively. The dataset also includes demographic variables, coded as follows: Sex (“Sex”): “0” mean “female” and “1” mean “male”. Role in school (“Role”): The first category (“0”) referred school staff who spent four hours or more in charge of the same group of children or adolescents, mainly kindergarten and elementary school teachers. The second category (“1”) included school staff members who spent less than four hours per day with the same group of students, like teachers of specific courses such as art, music, physical education, lunchtime or playground monitors. The last category (“2”) comprised staff such as head teachers, special education teachers or school psychologists who were not in charge of groups of children or adolescents but encountered them individually. School level in which the participant was working (“Level”): First category (“0”) included staff working in kindergarten or elementary school, second category (“1”) grouped staff working in middle or high school and the third category (“2”) referred to staff working in both levels. Results showed lower levels of knowledge in the reporting sections and significant relationship with detection and reporting experiences.

Raw data from the study “Functioning in adult patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: Exploring the role of environmental factors using focus groups”. The document shows that the most ICF categories cited by the patients were related to products or substances for personal consumption (e110), such as medication and disease-related healthy food issues in the diet, the importance of the relationship with health professionals (e355), including doctors, nurses, psychologists, and physiotherapists, accessibility to health services (e580), technological support (e115), the role of caregivers (e310), and certain problems related with the disability caused by the disease, such as muscle weakness, intolerance to physical activity, and fatigue, with their consequences on mobility. The ICF categories related to environmental factors identified here are of value for clinicians treating patients with these rare diseases, as they raise awareness of the need to reinforce the facilitating role of specific environmental factors and reduce the negative impact of others to improve the patients’ daily functioning.